The person who commented that security in a mate produces better childbirth outcomes implied that marriage means more security in a mate, which is not necessarily true

I don't think we got any more critical than your blog post Ray. Polyamory is still on tender ground, and perhaps it is best to discuss it without criticism. People have enough to think about than what others choose in life.

I, at least, learned more from your thought than the show for now. I'm intrigued enough to read this book. Thanks for writing this up.

I am pretty much a traditionalist when it comes to this sort of thing, although I deign to criticize a lifestyle simply because I would not subscribe to it. Social practices are different in different societies and many forms of family have been tried.It seems to me, though, that traditional marriage as we have come to know it, is generally appropriate for western economies. If for example we argue that children might benefit more from communal family structure; that they would (and should) learn that they individually are not the center of the family universe, that might be an argument holding some weight: it could either contribute to their self-reliance and independence and/or overall adjustment to family life, or it might breed a race of amoral drones whose primary interest would be looking out for themselves. There is a delicate balance between teaching a child self-reliance and independence, and having helpless, hopeless apron-hangers who cannot make a decision as to what they should have for lunch; whom to befriend; and who means well towards them and who means them irreparable harm. Eugenicists had some grisly ideas and recipes as to how disabled people should be disposed of. We do not, as a normative rule, now think that disposal is the answer, and prefer to view such persons as 'differently abled'. Well, these are only intuition pumps (to mimic Dennett). I have no wish to write an essay about the subject, because it does not hold such an interest for me. Others are better equipped than I. This is, as Smith has intoned, tender ground and bears walking lightly, I think...

There was a blip on a local tekevision network this evening. Almost as if there were some subliminal message about polyamory. But, there was no message, no story, nothing. i found it odd but do not know what it means. You know what I think about this. You should also know I have neither the skill nor inclination to pursue some rampage against it. The matter is simply not important to me. Apparently someone IS worried. I won't speculate.

This is especially beneficial for [url=https://spacebar-clicker.com/]spacebar clicker[/url] those with physical disabilities or those who prefer keyboard shortcuts for quick access.

The exploration of polyamory versus monogamy geometry dash meltdown is a complex and nuanced discussion that involves considerations of human nature, cultural norms, and individual preferences.
The debate over whether monogamy is natural or a cultural construct is indeed intricate. Human behavior is often shaped by a combination of both innate tendencies and societal influences.
Authors like Helen Fisher argue that certain brain systems evolved to support pair bonding and monogamous relationships. On the other hand, authors like Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá argue that humans may not be inherently monogamous, pointing to historical and cross-cultural variations in relationship structures. And the discussion around polyamory and monogamy involves a consideration of both individual preferences and societal expectations. It emphasizes the importance of critical reflection, effective communication, and a willingness to challenge traditional norms to create relationships that are fulfilling and authentic for all involved parties.

Exploring polyamory as an alternative to monogamy involves understanding the dynamics of romantic involvement with multiple partners subway surfers unblocked simultaneously. Carrie Jenkins' insights could shed light on the philosophical aspects of navigating such relationships.

Unleash your inner music detective in spotle! Explore the vast realm of Spotify's top artists and decipher the clues to unveil the hidden musical identity. Are you up for the challenge?