The Big Bang theory is the prevailing theory about the “birth” of the universe.
We can trace our fundamental forces (strong and weak interaction, electromagnetism, gravity) back to microseconds after the big bang. If we can trace them back this far, wouldn't the only way to change the fundamental laws of the universe be to recreate the conditions of the big bang? Which is, of course, impossible.
- Zach in the University of Arkansas
Excellent question, Zach! We put it to our guest on the show, Massimo Pigliucci, and he had this answer:
There are a couple of possible answers to that question:(I) we *think* we can trace things back to microseconds after the Big Bang, but that's because we *assume* the current laws have not changed. We don't actually know this. David Hume used something like this to set up is famous problem of induction: in order for science to work we have to assume, without proof, that things have and will always work the same way...(II) we don't need to recreate the Big Bang, according to Smolin we might be able to get information about what happened before because whatever was there may have left traces. Needless to say, this is highly speculative.
Log in or register to post comments
Quantum physics is regarded by many as the most powerful predictive theory science has produced. But there is no interpretation of what the theory means that all knowledgeable scientists and phil
All the matter we have ever observed accounts for less than 5% of the universe. The rest?
At the foundation of modern theoretical physics lie the equations that define our universe, telling us of its beginnings, evolution, and future.
Strange things are said about time: that it's illusory, that it has no direction. But what about space, or the space-time continuum? What exactly is space-time?