Is race a discredited pseudo-scientific category? Or a real dimension of difference among humans? Or a socially constructed reality? What difference does it make? John and Ken question the categor
Is race a social construct?
Is there any scientific basis for race?
Are racial categories themselves racist?
How are the above three questions related to each other? We might be inclined to think that, if there's no scientific basis for race, then it's a social construct. Does the fact that some biological/genetic differences track racial differences change the equation?
Or is it perhaps that, if we wanted a more scientifically accurate set of racial distinctions, they would not look anything like today's racial categories? But if racial categories were drawn arbitrarily by white colonizers and imperialists, can we conclude that racial categories are themselves racist?
These are the sort of questions that were running through my head reading this wonderful National Geographic article on why there's no scientific basis for race:
Do take a look! This article complements well another National Geographic article on the magazine's own history with race and racism:
The articles both feature in NatGeo's April "Race Issue." Would highly recommend exploring!
Log in or register to post comments
Many people identify strongly with the ethnic or racial group to which they belong – as Jews, or African-Americans, or Latinos. But to which groups does a person truly belong? President Obama ha
Astronomy is science; Astrology is pseudo-science. Evolutionary Biology is science; Creationism is pseudo-science.
Started in the wake of George Zimmerman's 2013 acquittal in the death of Trayvon Martin, the #BlackLivesMatter movement has become a powerful campaign demanding redress for the mistreatment of Afri
Despite tremendous strides made towards civil and political rights in the United States, discrimination and exclusion based on race, class, gender, and sexuality are still pervasive.