Gender
Jan 04, 2005Are gender roles and differences fixed, once and for, all by biology? Or is gender socially constructed and culturally variable?
Are gender roles and differences fixed, once and for, all by biology? Or is gender socially constructed and culturally variable?
Some feminists hold that there are specially feminine ways of knowing, and the current scientific research is flawed for not recognizing them.
The concept of a wife has been embedded in cultures, religious practices, social customs and economic patterns of wildly different sorts.
Philosophy isn't just about cosmic issues. Every day is full of events that raise philosophical questions: why do we eat the things we eat, work the way we work, go to the places we go?
Hannah Arendt was one of the most original and influential philosophers of the 20th century. Her work considered historical and c...
Simone de Beauvoir is often cast as only a novelist or a mere echo of Jean-Paul Sartre. But she authored many philosophical texts beyon...
Are gender roles and differences fixed, once and for, all by biology? Or is gender socially constructed and culturally variable?
Some feminists hold that there are specially feminine ways of knowing, and the current scientific research is flawed for not recognizing them.
The concept of a wife has been embedded in cultures, religious practices, social customs and economic patterns of wildly different sorts.
Philosophy isn't just about cosmic issues. Every day is full of events that raise philosophical questions: why do we eat the things we eat, work the way we work, go to the places we go?
Hannah Arendt was one of the most original and influential philosophers of the 20th century. Her work considered historical and c...
Simone de Beauvoir is often cast as only a novelist or a mere echo of Jean-Paul Sartre. But she authored many philosophical texts beyon...
Comments (1)
Harold G. Neuman
Monday, September 18, 2017 -- 12:55 PM
Frankly, I just do not know.Frankly, I just do not know. It was many years (from the time I was in my teens, until about age 53 0r 54) before I had even the vaguest notion that I had an interest in philosophy. There was no particular movement towards philosophy while I was in high school. Middle class America, from the late fifties through the sixties and beyond, was not a hot bed of philosophical thought---for either men of women. "Doing philosophy" for a living probably was not contemplated, let alone seriously discussed by anyone other than class dweebs. And, even though I qualified on that score, talking about philosophy did nothing for one's popularity quotient and could result in a serious ass-whuppin' if one was male. Females might not have had to worry so much about this, but, well, as we now know today, bullying takes many forms. I have a sense that the Viet Nam war had something to do with the rise in philosophy in these United States. I have no specific proofs of this but suspect that someone does. Anyway, old habits die hard and older perceptions die much harder. Thinking is for everyone who wants to take the time and make the effort to do so. I'll leave it at that.