A good novel can do many things. It can distract us from the humdrum of daily existence, stimulate our imaginations, and delight us with its creative use of language.
With its 200th anniversary fast approaching in 2018, it might be time to revisit Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
In this audio clip from ABC, academics in the "Philosopher's Zone" discuss major themes and the predominant philosophies of the novel's day. Drawing from Shelley's Calvinist upbringing and prevalent ideas of the Romantic period, the hosts expand upon one-dimensional analyses of the novel, including analyses of the novel as a story about birth envy or as a cautionary tale against bold, scientific endeavors. Instead, as one participant of the discussion argues, the novel chiefly displays the psyche of someone "psychically tormented by the fear of death."
But what do you think of this anaylsis of Frankenstein? Do you buy it? Listen to the audio or read the transcript of the conversation here:
Log in or register to post comments
When is genetic manipulation morally permissible? For health? Beauty? Wit? What sorts of animals is it acceptable to clone? Should we ban stem cell research?
Philosophers think a lot about fiction. But do novelists think about philosophy? Do philosophers make good fictional characters? Can good stories be built around philosophical problems?
Recent advances in mapping the human genome suggest a vision of the future that might fill us with equal parts hope and dread.