Food Justice

Monday, February 2, 2015 -- 4:00 PM

An astounding one in eight people on the planet are undernourished, over three million children die every year from hunger or malnutrition, and two billion people suffer from one or more micronutrient deficiencies (Caritas). And as the world’s population continues to grow, with estimates putting it at ten billion by 2050, we can only expect the situation to get worse. Unless, of course, we do something about it. But for that to happen, we need to recognize that food insecurity on this level is not simply unfortunate, but it is deeply unjust. We need to reframe the global hunger problem in terms of food justice.

So, why are so many people on the planet malnourished or starving? It’s not because there isn’t enough food being produced in the world. People are hungry and malnourished because they either can’t afford the food that’s available, or the food that’s available is just not healthy and nutritious. Yet about a third of all the food that’s produced in the world doesn’t even make it onto the table, and of the food that we actually put in front of us, a lot of that ends up in the trash too. There’s obviously something wrong with a system that allows so many to go hungry, while at the same time, all this food is being grown simply to be thrown away. As Pope Francis put it, "We are in front of a global scandal of around one billion people who still suffer from hunger. We cannot look the other way.”

If we already produce enough food to feed everyone on the planet, then can’t we just figure out a better way to distribute that food to the most needy? It sounds like a simple, obvious solution, but the reality is a little more complicated. First, in order to transport food, certain infrastructure needs to be in place, and that’s often not the case in places where there’s a lot of food insecurity. Second, transporting all this food has costs—not just monetary costs, but climate costs. Most of our transportation system is still reliant on fossil fuels, which contributes to carbon in the atmosphere, so distributing food around the world cannot be the complete answer to the problem. And even if we figure out a more sustainable way to distribute all this food, it doesn’t mean that those who are most in need of healthy food will suddenly be able to afford to buy it.

Another solution would be for more people to grow their own food so they can be self-sufficient, but again, while this might sound simple enough, there are many factors preventing this from happening on the ground. Growing food requires resources—land, water, seeds, time, and so on. And as the global temperature increases, bringing with it more erratic weather patterns, such as extreme drought or flooding, in many places where there is already food insecurity, it is getting harder and harder to grow food on any consistent basis.

To understand why this depressing situation should be thought of as an injustice, we need to understand the role that we play in creating the problem. For example, lots of forests are cleared to raise livestock due to the high demand for meat. As forests are cut down, more carbon is released into the atmosphere, then there’s all this flatulent livestock, which has to be fed. So, in addition to the land used to house the cattle, there’s also land (and, of course, water) being used to grow food for livestock instead of for people.

And it’s not just meat. There’s also tropical fruit and vegetables, tea, coffee, chocolate, and many other foods that we in the west want to be able to buy cheaply. A lot of this food is grown far away in places that suffer from food and water insecurity. So again, all these local resources that could be used to grow food for the poor are used to grow cash crops for export, to satisfy our consumer demands. So, while millions are starving or malnourished around the globe, we are enjoying our coffee, quinoa, and coconut milk, which contributes to the global poor’s inability to become food secure. Our consumer choices have hidden costs, and it’s the poor who end up paying, both directly, by us hijacking their local resources, and indirectly, by contributing to global warming, which disproportionately affects the ability of those in poor regions to grow food. For a cogent and persuasive treatment of the relationship between food justice and climate change, see this article by Lori Gruen (recent guest on our show on the ethics of captivity) and Clement Loo.

Now, I don’t want to come across as lecturing anybody for their consumer choices. I include myself in the problem, and I understand that we can all be morally weak to some degree. We suffer from what the Greeks called akrasia, or weakness of will. We might know that something is the right thing to do, but it’s another thing to actually do that thing. This is part of the reason why many people still drive cars, knowing full well how the resulting carbon emissions contribute to climate change. So, while you might feel guilty about eating meat and drinking coffee, it’s another thing to stop.

But acknowledging that many of us suffer from weakness of will does not let us off the hook, morally speaking. In order to solve both the climate change problem and the related food insecurity problem, we need more than individuals changing their consumer choices, though obviously that has to be part of the solution. We also need major structural changes and to get those, we need individuals to put political pressure on governments and corporations to make the appropriate changes.

We also need to shift away from the idea that solving the food insecurity problem is a matter of personal choice, or charity. Charitable contributions can obviously help people, but if we think about it as just a matter of charity, we miss something important. Why? Because charity is what philosophers call a supererogatory act—it’s a good thing to do, but it’s not morally required. Instead of thinking about it as a personal choice, we need to shift our framework toward a view that considers solving the food insecurity problem as a matter of moral duty—something we are obligated to do, whether we want to or not. Another way to frame the issue is by thinking of access to healthy, nutritional food as a basic human right, something that every person on this planet is entitled to. We need to create a just food system to protect those rights for everyone. And if we’re serious about that, and about ensuring that future generations will be able to produce enough food to feed everyone on the planet, we simply cannot continue with our rampant consumerism.

Our guest on this week's show is Tim Benton, the UK's 'Champion' for Global Food Security.

Comments (6)


Or's picture

Or

Thursday, February 5, 2015 -- 4:00 PM

I find that perhaps the

I find that perhaps the problem lies in that an ecological attitude towards the world we live in is not consistently incorporated into our most basic education, or at least in the same persistent way that consumerism is. Once in a while, when confronted with tremendous visual images of famine and malnourished people, we feel shocked, as these images touch our most sensitive fibers. We then make a resolution to consciously act to support equal distribution of food resources. But this resolution is not a part of who we are; it is a consequence of a transitory state of mind.  No wonder that it doesn?t take long before we pause the ?action? button of this resolution, oddly right before our next meal.  Not only that, but we might even feel empowered by our free access to food and egoistically think ?Glad I am not one of these starving people?? or something of the sort. We are constantly jumping over fixing this problem of lack of education, so it?s no wonder we keep bumping into the consequences. Unless we all work to do a complete makeover of this tremendous situation is there really going to ever be a good answer to this globalized problem?

N. Bogdanov's picture

N. Bogdanov

Saturday, February 7, 2015 -- 4:00 PM

The problem of food justice,

The problem of food justice, and the philosophical framework within which we identify this problem, seems to be part of a larger class of problems, one that encompasses those issues that affect people globally. This should be taken more as a tentative claim than a definitive characterization, but the idea is that it seems like we can apply the same framework you describe in the case of food justice?namely reframing solving food insecurity as an obligation rather than an option?to other global problems, such as access to drinking water, affordable healthcare, education, and the like, provided that these problems persist because of the global effect of some action of ours. Food justice, then, would seem to have moral force only when we are implicated in food insecurity, as we happen to be currently because of the global nature of the food market.
This might lead us to conclude, however, that it is enough simply to stop contributing to the problem. Maybe we can just grow our own food, and bike everywhere, for example. However, it seems like you may be arguing that the moral obligation food justice places on us is one that requires us to take positive action, not just to eliminate ourselves from the problem equation. To take action is much more tricky, though, than simply to refrain from it. Might we not, for example, want to take action to promote decreasing the human population, rather than to promote feeding everyone currently counted in it? Certainly this can be framed as servicing the long-term cause of food justice. Are there facets of this philosophical approach to food justice that would either critique or encourage such a position, something that isn?t brought out in saying that the approach just remakes supererogatory action as obligatory?

MJA's picture

MJA

Sunday, February 8, 2015 -- 4:00 PM

Feast or famine is a natural

Feast or famine is a natural occurrence not only in ourselves and the rest of the animal world but in the plant world as well. Helping to equate these imbalances, be it Oneself or One and All, is a just and noble cause. 
A pendulum as is nature eventually finds a place to rest, a place called equilibrium, until of course it swings again, Nature's Way. 
Just be, =   

Guest's picture

Guest

Tuesday, July 21, 2015 -- 5:00 PM

I want to say that guys i

I want to say that guys i like your way talking. You have done really really well work. I still appreciate your hard working. You did really fantastic work. 

bilal's picture

bilal

Monday, March 21, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

Hi admin

Hi admin
I find that perhaps the problem lies in that extra and waste less attitude towards the world we live in is not consistently incorporated into our most basic education,i agreed with this statement,or at least in the same persistent way that consumerism is. Sometime we cant understand what we are doing and what we have done before. Once in a while, When i saw these kinds of person,really am feel shocked, as these images those are set in my mind 70-410 We then make a resolution to consciously act to support equal distribution of food resources. But this resolution is not a part of who we are; it is a consequence of a transitory state of mind.  No wonder that it doesn?t take long before we pause the ?action? button of this resolution, oddly right before our next meal.  Not only that, but we might even feel empowered by our free access to food and I am really glad to starving these people or something of the sort. We are constantly jumping over fixing this problem of lack of education, so it?s no wonder we keep bumping into the consequences. Unless we all work to do a complete makeover of this tremendous situation is there really going to ever be a good answer to this. Can you mention some more and effective hints????

Guest's picture

Guest

Tuesday, June 21, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

How do I can make websites

How do I can make websites cool as you??? Pesan Anang Ke Ashanty Setelah Tipes

 
 
 
 

Blog Archive

2018

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2017

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2016

December

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2015

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2005

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March