Ken and John discuss the future of philosophy with three rising stars in American philosophy: Elizabeth Harman from New York University, Brian Weatherson from Cornell University, and Sean Kelly fr
Male philosophers may think feminist philosophy has nothing to offer them. Yet feminist philosophy has already enriched analytic philosophy and promises to deepen philosophers' "serious engagement" with continental thinkers, argues Gary Gutting in this article from The Stone. Feminist philosophy, he writes, is much more than a political movement in this regard.
To give an earlier example in history, Gutting reminds readers that anayltic philosophy dominated in the philosophical establishment in the 1970s and 80s. "The pluralists" of philosophy though, comprised of pragmatists, metaphysicians, continental philosophers, post-structuralists, and critical theorists, challenged analytic philosophy's eminence in the APA, allowing the pluralists to gain more power and esteem. Gutting sees feminist philosophy as following a similar trend, but to an even greater extent. Its strong analytic arguments and emphasis on "situated knowledge" has already deepened the "masculinist view of knowledge" which, under structures of male-established and dominated practices, had previously been ignored.
What do you think of feminist philosophy's role in the future of philosophy? Check out the article here:
Log in or register to post comments
Are gender roles and differences fixed, once and for, all by biology? Or is gender socially constructed and culturally variable? How does gender differ from sex?
Some feminists hold that there are specially feminine ways of knowing, and the current scientific research is flawed for not recognizing them.
What is a family, and what distinguishes it from other kinds of associations? Is the traditional role of the family merely grounded in custom and habit, or is there a deeper philosophical justifi
What does gender have to do with science? The obvious answer is ‘nothing.’ Science is the epitome of an objective, rational, and disinterested enterprise.
Simone de Beauvoir is often cast as only a novelist or a mere echo of Jean-Paul Sartre.
Reactions to the word ‘feminist’ today range from staunch rejection or ambivalence to fervent endorsement and activism.