Philosophers' Corner


Comments

Nancy Elizabeth Keiler's picture
Submitted by Nancy Elizabeth... (not verified) on July 31, 2011

Re: todays show: What about the close to a half a billion Chinese workers, as an example, do they examine their life? You all got into this a little but not enough.
And is there a transcript of this, I missed the last part the joke, Mr. Smith's voice was muffled at times.
I love you guys! Nancy Keiler

Harold G. Neuman's picture
Submitted by Harold G. Neuman (not verified) on August 1, 2011

Philosophy is a broad topic, isn't it? And the word itself has come to mean just about anything someone or somegroup could want it to mean. The act of changing things is a philosophy, be those things political, cultural, theological, economic or what-have-you. The intention of keeping things just as they are is also philosophical (or dogmatic if one does not feel so generous.) That someone might write under titles such as Breakfast with Socrates and Driving with Plato is not outside of imagination. Imagination drives the pen and this is what it is all about.

I always wish a new writer well because writing is such an onerous and unforgiving occupation in the first place. So good luck to Mr. Smith. And continued good wishes for Philosophy Talk, the blog. How WOULD Plato,transported to modern times,react to automobiles?
About the same as Descartes or Kant, I should think. Certainly differently from Jules Verne...

James Claims's picture
Submitted by James Claims (not verified) on August 1, 2011

I look forward to seeing how he manages to weave philosophy into common experience. The feat reminds me of two of my favorite pop philosophy books, Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar, and Heiddeger and a Hippo Walk Through Those Pearly Gates. What shocked me about these books, the Plato one especially, is just how well they wove jokes into relatively recent philosophy. It was the first time I saw rigid designators joked about and put into a pop philosophy book. They made recent analytic philosophy accessible, and I'd like to see if Breakfast With Socrates can measure up to that.

Michael J Ahles's picture
Submitted by Michael J Ahles (not verified) on August 2, 2011

I would love to have Socrates over for breakfast,
Lincoln and Gandhi for lunch,
And Einstein for dinner again.
We would resolve the questions of inequity and gorge ourselves on truth. All the while sipping rather than hemlock a beautifully sweet unitea.

=
MJA

Dave the Carpenter's picture
Submitted by Dave the Carpenter (not verified) on August 4, 2011

Have just started reading Daniel C. Dennett's FREEDOM EVOLVES, Viking Penguin books, 2003. I like Dennett, not because I embrace everything he says, but because he has well-reasoned arguments for most of his ideas. Also, my own notion of the evolutionary aspects of all things human appears to receive some affirmation from folks like Mr. Dennett, so my thinking appears to be in good company: inasmuch as these learned scholars seem pretty successful.

Philosophy plays its role in our everyday lives whether we know that consciously or not. I would hazzard an informed guess that most of us think very little about philosophy, unless we have been moved by some outside force*. There are simply too many distractions in everyday living for most of us to give a flip about it.

It is not cool to try to engage friends in conversation about something that has no context within their current life struggles. This may change as they get older and less self-absorbed. Or they may go to their final rest, blissfully ignorant of what they might have learned.

(*Frankly, I have no specific outside force in mind. It's all good until you need a new roof.)

Get Philosophy Talk

Radio

Sunday at 10am, PST, KALW, 91.7 FM, Local Public Radio, San Francisco

Podcast

Individual Downloads  via CdBaby or Itunes.  Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via Iamplify

Recent Featured Blogs

  • If God Is Dead, Why Isn't Everything Permitted?

    There may or may not be a God; but there definitely is morality. So what’s the problem exactly? It's what Dostoyevsky said: if God is dead, then everything is permitted. That means no distinction between right and wrong and thus no morality. 

    March 27, 2015 | 1 comment | Read More »
  • Mental “Disorder”: Do You Miss the Mountains?

    Do you get sadder than most people? Depressed. Do you make choices more spontaneously? Impulsive. Do you like your place exceptionally clean? OCD. Is the DSM just an instruction manual for how to be “normal,” backed by the bewildering authority of “science” and the intimidating stare of men in white coats?

    March 24, 2015 | 0 comments | Read More »
  • Democracy in Crisis

    If we're talking about American Democracy, then our title is pretty optimistic, since it presupposes there is an American democracy to be in crisis. If you told me the passenger pigeon was in crisis, that would also be optimistic, since the passenger pigeon went extinct a century or so ago.

    March 20, 2015 | 11 comments | Read More »
  • Forbidden Words

    When we say "forbidden," we don’t mean legally forbidden. We’re talking about morally forbidden words – words that hurt, insult, and demean.

    March 12, 2015 | 6 comments | Read More »
  • Disorders of the Mind - The Philosophy of Psychiatry

    There’s something odd about how psychiatry defines mental disorders—namely, by their symptoms. It’s to be expected, on some level. After all, how else could doctors diagnose psychiatric disorders, if not, in part, by their symptoms?

    March 8, 2015 | 3 comments | Read More »

Pages