Turbo-Charging the MindDec 30, 2012
The rapid advance of computer technology in recent decades has produced a vast array of intelligent machines that far outstrip the human mind in speed and capacity.
AI takeover—the hypothetical event wherein computers or robots take over the world and obliterate humankind—is a common trope in science fiction books and apocalyptic movies. But is superintelligent AI really something we should fear?
In this TEDTalk, scientist and philosopher Grady Booch thinks not. While movies like The Matrix, Metropolis, and The Terminator exacerbate humans' fears of being supplanted by technology—that is, that we might develop technology that is much too advanced for own good—we forget, in Booch's view, an important point. Engineers are not looking to build sentient machines, they are looking to build "simple brains" that can simply carry out tasks. And even if engineers did manage to develop the technology to make systems that have a theory of mind and ethical and moral foundations, he argues, we would teach them our own moral systems, not ones which would try to subvert us. Plus we can be assured that we can always unplug what we have built.
But is Booch too optimistic about the innocence of superintelligent AI? Could or is there some technology whose development worries you? Enter your comments below, and check out his TedTalk here:
Harold G. Neuman
Wednesday, September 20, 2017 -- 11:26 AMFor the first twenty plus
For the first twenty plus years of my life, I loved the world of science fiction. Heinlein; Herbert; Anderson; Bradbury; Clarke and so many others I have forgotten. I recall a short quotation, the origin of which escapes me now: What the mind can conceive, the man can do. I think this answers the question regarding innocence and AI. Let's think, for a moment, that science and technology are virtually limitless (I'm only playing the Devil's advocate now, so don't get your knickers in a bunch). After all, we do have a tendency, as a sentient species, to believe we can do most anything. And, in the long view, up to now,we have done much---some of which we probably should not have done. Its creators anguished over the advent of nuclear energy and the bomb. Paul Tibbetts carried that anguish for many years after flying the Enola Gay over Japan and dropping an atomic bomb. Technology does not worry me. Our will to restrain it does.
Tuesday, October 31, 2017 -- 9:59 PMHi Harold,
I like the way you put this a lot. Your ending line makes me think of Amazon, Google, IBM, Facebook, Apple, DeepMind, Microsoft, and IBM's recently formed coalition, called the Partnership on AI to Benefit People and Society. The coalition aims to refine AI companies' practices to promote things like "fairness... transparency... values and ethics," etc, in the hopes of preventing technological "catastrophe" and better (self)regulating the inventions they create with AI. But Professor Annette Bernhardt of UCSF offers a different proposal (see here: http://bit.ly/2il8dOH) which argues that regular citizens should be included in the coalition's decision-making process. I am curious to hear your thoughts.