Show

Would You Want to Live Forever?

Week of: 
January 20, 2004
What is it: 

Pick your favorite age. You are healthy, career thriving, family intact (at least pretend!). Would you like to live forever at that age, in that health, with those friends and family members also living forever with you? Immortality, on earth? How about an extra fifty or one hundred years or two hundred beyond your present life expectancy?

  • Yes! Think of all I could get done!
  • No. I would be bored!
  • Yes, I could sit on the beach, and be in no hurry to do anything.
  • No, life gets its meaning from having a shape, and things without boundaries have no shape.

Would an immortal human life be incredibly boring or is a good human life so good it's worth living to eternity?

Listening Notes: 

Why do we want to avoid death? Life is a good thing, and more of a good thing is good, so we should want to live forever. Should life have a shape or is it enough to be pleasurable? John introduces John Fischer, professor at the University of California at Riverside. Fischer thinks that immortality would not result in unending boredom or pain. Does the finiteness of life make it more enjoyable? Fischer thinks that death is not the only thing that can give a shape to life. Would immortality entail lots of bad things happening to you?

Would a life devoid of suffering be good? Is the point of life to prepare us for death? Is your life less meaningful if you've lived a shorter time? Fischer points out that we use the phrase “meaning of life” in many different ways. Can we conceive of circumstances in which it would be desirable to be immortal? Is life intrinsically good? Fischer distinguishes between good for the individual and good for the community.

Is there anything that would be worth doing forever? Many people try to think of one particular activity, but Fischer thinks that certain mixtures of activities would be worth doing forever. Is the Groundhog Day model of immortality desirable?

  • Amy Standen the Roving Philosophical Reporter (Seek to 05:04): Amy Standen interviews Dr. Phillip Miller and Bill Hurlbut about issues of aging and longevity.
  • Ian Shoales the Sixty Second Philosopher (Seek to 36:00): Ian Shoales give a rapid biography of the Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard.
  • Conundrum (Seek to 47:15): Lisa from the Bay Area asks whether she should lie to allow her children to go to a good daycare. Is it prudent? Is it moral?

John M. Fischer, Professor of Philosophy, University of California Riverside

Related Resources: 

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

 

  • Milan Kundera's novel about life and death, Immortality  

     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Get Philosophy Talk

Radio

Sunday at 10am, PST, KALW, 91.7 FM, Local Public Radio, San Francisco

Podcast

Individual Downloads  via CdBaby or Itunes.  Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via Iamplify

John Perry and Ken Taylor

Continue the Conversation

Sidebar Menu

Upcoming Shows

  • March 29 : Morality in a Godless World
    Belief in God is thought by many to be the only possible source of morality, such that without a God, “everything is permitted.” Yet godlessness is...
  • April 5 : The Nature of Wilderness
    Nowadays we think of wilderness as a fully natural environment that contrasts sharply with the designed and constructed environments in which we...
  • April 12 : The Art of Non-Violence
    We all hope for peace. Yet in the face of violence, it often seems the only recourse is more violence. Advocates of non-violence claim it’s not...
  • April 19 : Economics - Science or Cult?
    With the recent global economic crisis, many people wonder if our economic policies are built on sound principles or on dubious, unscientific claims...
  • April 26 : When Democracies Torture
    Torture is prohibited under international law and is widely considered a human rights violation. But despite the fact that 157 countries ratified the...

Support Philosophy Talk

DONATE TODAY

Philosophy Talk relies on the support of listeners like you to stay on the air and online. Any contribution, large or small, helps us produce intelligent, reflective radio that questions everything, including our most deeply-held beliefs about science, morality, culture, and the human condition. Make your tax-deductible contribution now through Stanford University's secure online donation page. Thank you for your support, and thank you for thinking!