Show

Would You Want to Live Forever?

Week of: 
January 20, 2004
What is it: 

Pick your favorite age. You are healthy, career thriving, family intact (at least pretend!). Would you like to live forever at that age, in that health, with those friends and family members also living forever with you? Immortality, on earth? How about an extra fifty or one hundred years or two hundred beyond your present life expectancy?

  • Yes! Think of all I could get done!
  • No. I would be bored!
  • Yes, I could sit on the beach, and be in no hurry to do anything.
  • No, life gets its meaning from having a shape, and things without boundaries have no shape.

Would an immortal human life be incredibly boring or is a good human life so good it's worth living to eternity?

Listening Notes: 

Why do we want to avoid death? Life is a good thing, and more of a good thing is good, so we should want to live forever. Should life have a shape or is it enough to be pleasurable? John introduces John Fischer, professor at the University of California at Riverside. Fischer thinks that immortality would not result in unending boredom or pain. Does the finiteness of life make it more enjoyable? Fischer thinks that death is not the only thing that can give a shape to life. Would immortality entail lots of bad things happening to you?

Would a life devoid of suffering be good? Is the point of life to prepare us for death? Is your life less meaningful if you've lived a shorter time? Fischer points out that we use the phrase “meaning of life” in many different ways. Can we conceive of circumstances in which it would be desirable to be immortal? Is life intrinsically good? Fischer distinguishes between good for the individual and good for the community.

Is there anything that would be worth doing forever? Many people try to think of one particular activity, but Fischer thinks that certain mixtures of activities would be worth doing forever. Is the Groundhog Day model of immortality desirable?

  • Amy Standen the Roving Philosophical Reporter (Seek to 05:04): Amy Standen interviews Dr. Phillip Miller and Bill Hurlbut about issues of aging and longevity.
  • Ian Shoales the Sixty Second Philosopher (Seek to 36:00): Ian Shoales give a rapid biography of the Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard.
  • Conundrum (Seek to 47:15): Lisa from the Bay Area asks whether she should lie to allow her children to go to a good daycare. Is it prudent? Is it moral?

John M. Fischer, Professor of Philosophy, University of California Riverside

Related Resources: 

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

 

  • Milan Kundera's novel about life and death, Immortality  

     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Get Philosophy Talk

Radio

Sunday at 10am, PST, KALW, 91.7 FM, Local Public Radio, San Francisco

Podcast

Individual Downloads  via CdBaby or Itunes.  Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via Iamplify

John Perry and Ken Taylor

Continue the Conversation

Sidebar Menu

Upcoming Shows

  • September 6 : Has Science Replaced Philosophy?
    Modern science has made astounding progress in our understanding of ourselves and the universe. Physics, neuroscience, and psychology now tackle...
  • September 13 : The Ethics of Drone Warfare
    The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, aka ‘drone,’ is increasingly the weapon of choice in America's military operations. Many laud its ability to maintain...
  • September 20 : The Changing Face of Feminism
    Reactions to the word ‘feminist’ today range from staunch rejection or ambivalence to fervent endorsement and activism. While many young women claim...
  • September 27 : The Technology of Immortality
    Some futurists believe we are not far from a time when technology and medicine will be so advanced that humans need no longer die of old age or other...
  • October 4 : Dance as a Way of Knowing
    Whether it be rhythmic or shuffling, athletic or pedestrian, erotic or just social, dance is an art form that utilizes movement of the body through...

Support Philosophy Talk

DONATE TODAY

Philosophy Talk relies on the support of listeners like you to stay on the air and online. Any contribution, large or small, helps us produce intelligent, reflective radio that questions everything, including our most deeply-held beliefs about science, morality, culture, and the human condition. Make your tax-deductible contribution now through Stanford University's secure online donation page. Thank you for your support, and thank you for thinking!