Show

Love

Week of: 
November 30, 2004
What is it: 

Is love just a (second-hand) emotion?  Is it a feeling?  A disparate group of feelings, glandular responses, and ill-considered commitments called by a single word so that poets will have something to write about?  A poor substitute for true friendship imposed upon us by lust?  Or the deepest and most satisfying of human conditions?

Listening Notes: 

What is love? Is there any one thing we call “love”? John describes three paradigms: romantic love, family love, and love for friends. Ken says that in each you take the desires and goals of the other person as your own. How can one love one's neighbor as oneself? Does love entail extra obligations? Ken introduces Noël Merino, professor at Humboldt University. Marino agrees with Ken's idea that love of people broadly is adopting their goals as your own. She says that romantic love is a difference of degree rather than a difference of kind. Do lovers complete each other? John says that it sounds dangerous to lose your own identity in a relationship. 

How is loving your romantic partner different from loving a child or friend? Marino thinks that they are similar, although romantic love includes sexual desire and a greater intensity. Is there some quality of the person that you love has, as in the example from the Symposium, or is it just an accident of history that you love one person rather than another? Marno supports the historical idea of love. Love takes on a relational component over time that deepens the relationship. How can one love humanity? Does the possibility that love can be reduced to the interaction of endorphins undermine the worth of love? 

Is everything we do out of self-love? Do we love solely out of self-love? Ken asks if we have special obligations to our loved ones, then does that interfere with our obligations towards complete strangers? How does love interact with moral theories? Most moral theories ignore love and Marino thinks this needs to be addressed. Why should we be moved by views, such as Schopenhauer's, that say that the purpose of love is solely to reproduce? 

  • Amy Standen the Roving Philosophical Reporter (Seek to 04:30): Amy Standen interviews several San Franciscans about what they think love is. 
  • Ian Shoales the Sixty Second Philosopher (Seek to 49:58): Ian Shoales looks at the history of love in philosophy, from Socrates to Mill to Heidegger.

Noël Merino, Professor of Philosophy, Humboldt State University

Related Resources: 
  • Wikipedia

Get Philosophy Talk

Live

Sunday at 10am, PST, KALW, 91.7 FM, Local Public Radio, San Francisco

Streaming

Broadcast live on your iPhone or Android using the Public Radio Player

Podcast

Podcast - individual episodes, multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk on sale now

Subscribe

Subscribe to our free weekly download service, and our monthly eNewsletter

John Perry and Ken Taylor

Talk to Us

Sidebar Menu

Upcoming Shows

  • February 05 : Black Solidarity
    From the abolition of slavery to the Black Power movement, black unity has been considered a powerful method to achieve freedom and equality. ...
  • February 12 : The 2012 Dionysus Awards
    Movies play a large role in modern life. We enjoy watching them; we idolize the actors and actresses who appear in them; we analyze the directors....
  • February 19 : What Is 'Normal'?
    What does it mean to be normal?  And abnormal?  Who gets to decide, and what are the repercussions?  When do we applaud deviations...
  • February 26 : Pantheism
    Pantheism is the doctrine that the world is either identical with God or an expression of His nature. Pantheistic ideas appear in many schools of...
  • March 04 : Epicurus and the Good Life
    Though his name is often misleadingly associated with indulgence in sensual pleasures, the philosopher Epicurus developed a far-reaching system of...

Support Philosophy Talk