| back to Past Shows |
![]() Notes on show: Original Airdate 07/05/2009 |
|||||||||||||
Listening Notes Does
technology affect us or do we affect it? Do internet social
networking sites operate as a substitute for face-to-face
contact? How have sites like Facebook and Twitter changed how we
conceive of and publicly present our identity? These questions
guide this edition of Philosophy Talk, where John and Ken are joined by
a live audience and guest Malcolm Parks, Professor of Communications at
the University of Washington. John opens the show by relating his
skepticism about social networking, describing his use of Facebook and
its bizarre concept of friendship, where a “friend” might
be someone you’ve never met. What does friendship mean in
this context? How has social networking changed how casual
friends, businesses and customers, lovers, and activists united in a
cause relate to one another? Malcolm Parks joins the conversation
and suggests that these relationships are enhanced by the immediate
connectivity social networking offers. Ken proposes that social networking
not only opens up new forms of social organization and connection, but
also encourages new ways of thinking about who we are as people.
Social networking profiles, such as Facebook, operate as a theater for
the public declaration of identity. These sites give us
unparalleled control over how we present ourselves publicly, and Ken
argues that who we are is shaped is shaped by how we declare ourselves
in such situations. An audience member poses the question whether
representing yourself as a certain identity makes you that person,
further problematized by our ability to be multiple people online. The conversation turns to how social
networking undermines top-down structures of authority, such as
peer-reviewed publications, by giving anyone with a computer and access
to the internet the ability to connect with others and publish
material. While older forms of authority allow for
quality-control and a degree of exclusivity, the dissemination of
knowledge through social networking is competitive and dialectical but
unmoderated and open to potential hazards such as trolling. The
show closes with the conclusion that social networking is reconfiguring
the social world, for better or worse.
Additional
Resources Books
Web Resources
|
||||||||||||||
| ©
2004 Philosophy Talk Productions. All rights reserved. Created by Whitetail Web Design. |