 |
| Topic: |
| Audio: |
|

Download |
|

Listen
Online |
REPLACE 'YYMMDD'
|
| Guest: |

Daniel
Little, Chancellor and Professor of Philosophy, University of
Michigan-Dearborn |
| What
is it? |
Is history just a series of
events, or an interpretation of those events?
Is there progress in history?
Can
history be objective, or is it, as Napoleon said, just the version of
past
events that people have decided to agree upon?
Ken and John delve into the past and its
meaning with Daniel Little,
Chancellor of the University of Michigan-Dearborn and author of History's Pathways (forthcoming in March
2009) and Varieties of Social Explanation. |
Listening Notes
Ken and John kick off the show by – as happens so often –
figuring out what they are talking about. Is history just a sum total
of events? Or are representations of the past part of what makes the
mast what it is? Is history more like literature or science?
After the philosophical reporter reports, Daniel joins Ken and John and
they discuss the nature of cause in history. Are there causal laws in
history? What is human causation and what is structural causation, and
is there really a difference? Given that each event has many interwoven
causes, how does the historian choose which causes to include in a
historical study of an event?
In the next section, Daniel, Ken, and John continue to explore the
balance between individual human choices, structural causes, and
contingent, chance happenings. Would Hitler have been able to start
World War II without structural causes and chance happenings? Ken notes
that structural causes seem to constrain, but not determine, what
happens.
Ken and John then wonder how much we should look for patterns in
history and narrate, rather than just report brute facts in
history. Daniel points out that finding patterns in history does
help us learn from the past. But how do we balance the need for
narration with accuracy and comprehensiveness? Daniel defends the
reputation and cause of academic history against accusations of unjust
prejudice and bias.
In the last segment, Ken and John continue to discuss with Daniel the
balance between getting the facts just right and pulling out inspiring,
educational stories from history. Daniel emphasizes the importance of
historians’ commitment to standards of rigor and commitment to
evidence, and a caller argues that learning from the past means facing
up to it, not sugar-coating it to find inspiration. Ken agrees, but
reminds everyone of the value of the American attitude that we are not
constrained to interpret ourselves as being ‘the same
people’ as the people in our past who have made mistakes.
- Roving Philosophical Reporter
(seek to 6:00): Philosophy Talk’s roving philosophical reporter
visits Presidio National Park in San Francisco, which has a new
display on the relatively unknown war between the US and
Philippines in 1900. She discovers how seemingly small remnants from
the past help us uncover and understand large historical events.
- 60-second Philosopher
(seek to 49:50): Ian Shoales reports on Giovanni Battista Vico,
influential author of ‘The New Science’. Vico took an
unconventionally poetic approach to history, and encouraged us to
remember that historical actors are not just rational thinkers, but
people with virtues and vices.
Additional Resources
Online Resources
Books

|
|