| back to Past Shows |
![]() Notes on show: Original Airdate 9/19/2006 |
|||||||||||||
About
the Guest
Peter Kivy is Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University and author of many books concerning the philosophy of music, including the especially readable and useful Introduction to the Philosophy of Music. Listening
Notes
John and Ken begin by trying to pin down an exact definition for music. Ken proposes that it is a collection of organized sounds, although realizing that there are many organized sounds in the world which we usually don't consider music. John accordingly notes that philosophers and musicologists might consider organization a necessary but not sufficient condition for a set of sounds to be musical. For a long time music was accompanied by voice, but John points out that historically we don't know that much about the details of music except those musical traditions surrounding religion or tradition that were written about or passed on. Ken
points out that music has a lot of emotional power over us, but differs
a lot from other forms of art. In a novel or a play the emotions are
linked to the world represented to the observer, but in music it is
harder to understand where the emotions come from. Sad music almost
universally makes people sad, but is it something in the music or in us
that moves us so? John points out that music was one of the first art
forms to be thought of as non-representational, and that it has a
stronger universal connection to our emotions than other
non-representational forms like abstract visual art. John explains the
distinction between primary and secondary qualities and philosophy and
relates them to the emotional response we have to music. Ken thinks
that there is something internal to music that determines its effect
upon us, noting that small structural changes in a piece can
drastically alter our emotional experience.
John
and Ken introduce the guest, Peter Kivy; Board of Governors Professor
of Philosophy from Rutgers University, also author of many article and
a book concerning the philosophy of music. Peter Kivy begins by noting
that the given definition of music as a collection of organized sounds
is troublesome in contemporary times with the rise of random and atonal
musical styles, though Jon wonders whether anyone actually listens to
such music. Peter Kivy points out that a lot of music out there doesn't
get listened to anyway! In order to see how hard it is to define music,
John and Ken play the beginning of Mozart's 41st Symphony
and compare that to Varese's Ionization
piece. Ken points out that music may be one of those things that you
know when you experience it, but cannot precisely define. Peter Kivy
mentions a piece called Talking Fugue where the
"music"
consists of overlaid conversations. John concludes that music seems to
be a concept with paradigm cases we all recognize and fringe cases
which may seem musical to one person but not to another. Ken further
suggests that calling something music is an honorific title that shows
we appreciate it.
Next
Ken and John ask Peter to explain how the non-representational art of
music, especially wordless music, can produce such passionate emotional
responses in people. Peter Kivy believes that it doesn't! Or, at least,
that the emotions evinced by music are not the garden variety emotions,
but rather a specific love and enthusiasm for the music, an emotional
response which does not really have a name. Kivy argues this point
through the distinction of good and bad sad music, and how good sad
music arouses a stronger feeling of sadness than bad sad music. Ken
challenges Peter Kivy with examples of music enhancing garden variety
emotions like fear and excitement in movies. Peter acknowledges that
the music combined with the film can arouse fear, but points out that
the soundtrack alone does not have the same effect. John brings up
examples of historically meaningful and patriotic songs as well as
anthems which arouse contradictory emotions. Peter Kivy argues that
these feelings arise from associations and are not quite aesthetically
relevant.
Callers
discuss Peter Kivy's theories on the garden variety emotions and music
as well as the relationship between mathematics and music, music in
movies, and other styles and subjects. Kivy suggests that individuals
in other fields may experience the same sort of emotional experience
with their subjects that musicians and music-lovers do when they
appreciate great pieces. Finally, John and Ken discuss the relationship
between the culture of music and ethics, morality, and civilization
with Peter Kivy, concluding that music really is an important part of
societies around the world.
Additional
Resources
Books: Web Resources:
Wikipedia: JSTOR Articles
(Subscription Required)
|
||||||||||||||
| ©
2006 Stanford University. All rights reserved. Created by Whitetail Web Design. |