Topic:	Drug Legalization
Audio:
Download
Listen Online	This text will be replaced
Guest:	Peter de Marneffe; Professor of Philosophy, Arizona State University
What is it?	Ken and John discuss the philosophical issues underlying arguments for and against the legalization of drugs.  Does America's drug problem rest on confused philosophy?  Listen in and get more confused.

About the Guest

Peter de Marneffe has his Ph.D. from Harvard University. His primary interests are in political and moral philosophy.  He is the co-editor of Legalizing Drugs (For and Against).

Listening Notes

How are drugs defined? The official government list does not have a clear definition. What're the arguments against having drugs be illegal? The libertarian argument says that I can do whatever I want to my body, so the government should not interfere. Ken introduces Peter de Marneffe, professor at Arizona State University. What benefit does society reap from punishing drug use? De Marneffe makes a distinction in drug legalization: use and production. He thinks good arguments can be made for legalizing drug use. John asks if legalizing illegal drugs would make them as disruptive to life as alcohol is. Should the penalty structure for drugs be revised?

Is it fair that alcohol is legal while marijuana is not? De Marneffe says that we need to consider how heavy a burden not using certain substances are on the individuals that want to use them. Has the pot legalization experiment in Holland worked? De Marneffe thinks the case for legalization of marijuana is the strongest of all illegal drugs. One defense of current drug policies is that legalization of hard drugs would have the most damaging effects on youth. Lots of substances are dangerous or damaging, but they are not illegal. Why shouldn't things like fatty foods and sugar be made illegal?

Should research be done to produce drugs with no negative effects? What aspects of the current drug policy should be changed? Does drug prohibition decrease drug abuse substantially? De Marneffe thinks that if it does not, then there is no case for drug prohibition. John points out that we need to distinguish between hard and soft drugs.

• Amy Standen the Roving Philosophical Reporter (Seek to 04:32): Amy Standen interviews Quentin, a former drug addict.

• Ian Shoales the Sixty Second Philosopher (Seek to 37:00): Ian Shoales gives a brief biography of Aldous Huxley, author of The Doors of Perception and Brave New World.

• Conundrum (Seek to 48:30): Janice asks, if you are interviewing an extremely qualified applicant for a job but creeps you out, are you justified in hiring a less qualified person who you are comfortable? Are we justified in trusting first impressions?

Additional Resources

• Summary of the RAND Corporation's analysis of drug use and drug policy.

• The United States Government's official site on drug control policy.

• The homepage of the nation's leading organization working to end the war on drugs.

• The website of Partnership for a Drug-Free America

• An online version of Milton Friedman's “The Drug War as a Socialist Enterprise”

• James Inciardi's The Drug Legalization Debate

• Karen Balkin's book aimed at young adults, Drug Legalization

• Erich Goode's Between Politics and Reason: The Drug Legalization Debate

• James Gray's Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It

• Dirk Eldridge's Ending the War on Drugs

• Dan Baum's Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure

• Edward Behr's Prohibition: Thirteen Years That Changed America

• Norman Clark's Deliver Us from Evil: An Interpretation of American Prohibition

• Douglas Husak's Legalize This!: The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs

• The Libertarian Reader

• Aldous Huxley's Doors of Perception and Heaven and Hell