 |
| Topic: |
| Audio: |
|

Download |
|

Listen Online |
This text will be replaced
|
| Guest: |

Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, the Albert Guerard
Professor of Literature, Stanford University
|
| What
is it? |
Figure
skating is athletic and beautiful. How about a
bone-crunching tackle? Or a spikes-high slide into
second? Or a slam-dunk? Or an overweight
sixty-year-old at
a bowling alley? John and Ken discuss the nature of athletic
beauty with Hans Gumbrecht, author of In Praise of Athletic Beauty.
|
About
the Guest
Hans
Gumbrecht is Albert Guerard Professor in Literature and Professor of
French and Italian and Comparative Literature at Stanford University.
His interests include the history of scholarship and ideas, medieval
literature and culture, and aesthetics.
Listening Notes
Is
there such a thing as athletic beauty? Is it different from artistic
beauty? Is one somehow more beautiful, or more relevant to our lives?
What does athleticism represent? John and Ken begin the show by
discussing these matters, with Ken playing art's advocate and John
expressing his love for sports and athletics. John and Ken recount some
of their most memorable aesthetic moments, and realize that many of
them involve sports. Both Ken and John have a bit of trouble deciding
if sports are an artform, but they agree that sports have a power to
grip people in a meaningful way.
Ken introduces Hans Gumbrecht,
author of many works including "In Praise of Athletic Beauty" and
Albert Guerard Professor in Literature at Stanford University. John
asks Hans: Don't people care more about their team winning than looking
beautiful? Aren't championships and goals what attract people
to
sports? Gumbrecht agrees completely, but thinks that even in the most
diehard fans there exists a certain amount of appreciation for the
beauty of the game. Gumbrecht argues that beauty is the least mentioned
of the important reasons why people love sports, and that is why it is
interesting to discuss.
John asks about the use of the word
"aesthetic" and Gumbrecht explains how his position is essentially an
extension of Kantian aesthetics to the world of sports. Especially
important is Kant's idea that if you judge something as beautiful it is
hard for you to understand why or how others could not--and this seems
exceptionally true in terms of sports. Ken and Hans go on to discuss
Kant's ideas concerning the beautiful and the sublime and how this
relates to the difference between athletic beauty and traditional
artistic beauty. Ken goes on to discuss purposiveness and sports, how
the goals in sports are somewhat abstract and contrived but in
the
same sense are very real and simple--scoring a run and winning a game
versus hitting a ball a certain distance. Gumbrecht and John discuss
the different purposes in sport and how one appreciates more than just
the functional achievements of athletes, but also some aesthetic
quality contained in those actions (a home run vs a majestic home run).
John,
Ken, and Hans Gumbrecht go on to discuss favorite sports, sport
moments, and how sports and sporting events reflect human culture and
human attributes with callers. Callers also prompt discussion of how
sports can expand our beliefs about beauty and discover more beauty
within ourselves everyday.
- Polly
Stryker the Roving Philosophical Reporter
(Seek to 4:16): Polly interviews coaches and athletes in sumo wrestling
and gymnastics to get their perspective on beauty and
athleticism.
- Ian
Schoales the 60-second Philosopher
(Seek 50:02): Ian Schaoles speeds through the ancient Greek wrestling
tradition, Plato's athletic career, and later Roman sporting events.
Web
Resources
Books
|
|